Style cleanup.
Add some note about the main reason why st is still that big.
This commit is contained in:
		
							
								
								
									
										19
									
								
								st.c
									
									
									
									
									
								
							
							
						
						
									
										19
									
								
								st.c
									
									
									
									
									
								
							| @@ -3091,6 +3091,7 @@ xdraws(char *s, Glyph base, int x, int y, int charlen, int bytelen) { | ||||
| 		if(base.fg == defaultfg) | ||||
| 			base.fg = defaultunderline; | ||||
| 	} | ||||
|  | ||||
| 	if(IS_TRUECOL(base.fg)) { | ||||
| 		colfg.alpha = 0xffff; | ||||
| 		colfg.red = TRUERED(base.fg); | ||||
| @@ -3113,8 +3114,6 @@ xdraws(char *s, Glyph base, int x, int y, int charlen, int bytelen) { | ||||
| 		bg = &dc.col[base.bg]; | ||||
| 	} | ||||
|  | ||||
|  | ||||
|  | ||||
| 	if(base.mode & ATTR_BOLD) { | ||||
| 		if(BETWEEN(base.fg, 0, 7)) { | ||||
| 			/* basic system colors */ | ||||
| @@ -3144,7 +3143,8 @@ xdraws(char *s, Glyph base, int x, int y, int charlen, int bytelen) { | ||||
| 			colfg.green = ~fg->color.green; | ||||
| 			colfg.blue = ~fg->color.blue; | ||||
| 			colfg.alpha = fg->color.alpha; | ||||
| 			XftColorAllocValue(xw.dpy, xw.vis, xw.cmap, &colfg, &revfg); | ||||
| 			XftColorAllocValue(xw.dpy, xw.vis, xw.cmap, &colfg, | ||||
| 					&revfg); | ||||
| 			fg = &revfg; | ||||
| 		} | ||||
|  | ||||
| @@ -3155,7 +3155,8 @@ xdraws(char *s, Glyph base, int x, int y, int charlen, int bytelen) { | ||||
| 			colbg.green = ~bg->color.green; | ||||
| 			colbg.blue = ~bg->color.blue; | ||||
| 			colbg.alpha = bg->color.alpha; | ||||
| 			XftColorAllocValue(xw.dpy, xw.vis, xw.cmap, &colbg, &revbg); | ||||
| 			XftColorAllocValue(xw.dpy, xw.vis, xw.cmap, &colbg, | ||||
| 					&revbg); | ||||
| 			bg = &revbg; | ||||
| 		} | ||||
| 	} | ||||
| @@ -3235,7 +3236,7 @@ xdraws(char *s, Glyph base, int x, int y, int charlen, int bytelen) { | ||||
| 			u8fblen += u8cblen; | ||||
| 		} | ||||
| 		if(doesexist) { | ||||
| 			if (oneatatime) | ||||
| 			if(oneatatime) | ||||
| 				continue; | ||||
| 			break; | ||||
| 		} | ||||
| @@ -3258,6 +3259,8 @@ xdraws(char *s, Glyph base, int x, int y, int charlen, int bytelen) { | ||||
| 			 * Nothing was found in the cache. Now use | ||||
| 			 * some dozen of Fontconfig calls to get the | ||||
| 			 * font for one single character. | ||||
| 			 * | ||||
| 			 * Xft and fontconfig are design failures. | ||||
| 			 */ | ||||
| 			fcpattern = FcPatternDuplicate(font->pattern); | ||||
| 			fccharset = FcCharSetCreate(); | ||||
| @@ -3301,6 +3304,12 @@ xdraws(char *s, Glyph base, int x, int y, int charlen, int bytelen) { | ||||
| 		xp += xw.cw * wcwidth(u8char); | ||||
| 	} | ||||
|  | ||||
| 	/* | ||||
| 	 * This is how the loop above actually should be. Why does the | ||||
| 	 * application have to care about font details? | ||||
| 	 * | ||||
| 	 * I have to repeat: Xft and Fontconfig are design failures. | ||||
| 	 */ | ||||
| 	/* | ||||
| 	XftDrawStringUtf8(xw.draw, fg, font->set, winx, | ||||
| 			winy + font->ascent, (FcChar8 *)s, bytelen); | ||||
|   | ||||
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user